From: Allison Henderson Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3 v2] XFS TESTS: Fix 252 Failure: Update 252 Golden Output Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 22:26:35 -0700 Message-ID: <4E09660B.7050706@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1309235247-32650-1-git-send-email-achender@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1309235247-32650-3-git-send-email-achender@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20110628050900.GL32466@dastard> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Ext4 Developers List , Eric Sandeen , Josef Bacik To: Dave Chinner Return-path: Received: from e39.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.160]:46460 "EHLO e39.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755729Ab1F1F0t (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jun 2011 01:26:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20110628050900.GL32466@dastard> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 06/27/2011 10:09 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 09:27:26PM -0700, Allison Henderson wrote: >> New filtered golden output for test 252 >> >> Signed-off-by: Allison Henderson >> --- >> :100644 100644 930c924... fcfd121... M 252.out >> 252.out | 272 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------ >> 1 files changed, 170 insertions(+), 102 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/252.out b/252.out >> index 930c924..fcfd121 100644 >> --- a/252.out >> +++ b/252.out >> @@ -1,239 +1,307 @@ >> QA output created by 252 >> 1. into a hole >> +daa100df6e6711906b61c9ab5aa16032 >> 2. into allocated space >> -0: [0..7]: data >> +0: [0..7]: extent >> 1: [8..23]: hole >> -2: [24..39]: data >> +2: [24..39]: extent >> +cc58a7417c2d7763adc45b6fcd3fa024 > > I don't really like the way this weakens the test for XFS. With this > change, the test no longer is checking that unwritten extent > behaviour is correct. > > Rather than weakening the test, perhaps it would be better to > execute 252 for XFS only (with the md5sums added), and then > duplicate it to a new test for all filesystems to run with the > weaker result checking that using the new filter function gives us. > With the amount of common code the two tests share, it should be > trivial to do this.... > Alrighty, that sounds pretty straight forward, as long as every one is in agreement. I think that would help retain the tests effectiveness. Eric, Josef, what are your thoughts? Allison Henderson > Cheers, > > Dave.