From: Kazuya Mio Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11 RESEND] libe2p: Add new function get_fragment_score() Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:21:30 +0900 Message-ID: <4E09AB2A.6000105@sx.jp.nec.com> References: <4DF8522F.2020304@sx.jp.nec.com> <20110617031814.GA31884@thunk.org> <4DFB62C7.5070008@redhat.com> <4E008045.1040909@sx.jp.nec.com> <4E044AB4.9010804@sx.jp.nec.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Andreas Dilger , Eric Sandeen , "Ted Ts'o" , ext4 To: Greg Freemyer Return-path: Received: from TYO201.gate.nec.co.jp ([202.32.8.193]:38772 "EHLO tyo201.gate.nec.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756751Ab1F1KWO (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jun 2011 06:22:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 2011/06/26 11:16, Greg Freemyer wrote: > I'm talking about sparse files. > > Where you might have: > > block_group1 - hole - block_group2 - hole - block_group3. > > Block_group2 has a head and a tail extent. In my mind, from a > performance perspective, they are symmetric. Meaning that having a > small extent at the beginning is no better and no worse than having a > small extent at the end. Thanks for your kind description. Your point is right. I'll think a little more about the fragmentation score. Regards, Kazuya Mio