From: Allison Henderson Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3 v2] XFS TESTS: Fix 252 Failure: Update 252 Golden Output Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 08:03:18 -0700 Message-ID: <4E09ED36.2040903@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1309235247-32650-1-git-send-email-achender@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1309235247-32650-3-git-send-email-achender@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20110628050900.GL32466@dastard> <4E09660B.7050706@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4E09D735.5060000@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Ext4 Developers List , Josef Bacik , xfs@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Return-path: Received: from e9.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.139]:44411 "EHLO e9.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755938Ab1F1PEO (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jun 2011 11:04:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4E09D735.5060000@redhat.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 06/28/2011 06:29 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 6/28/11 12:26 AM, Allison Henderson wrote: >> On 06/27/2011 10:09 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: >>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 09:27:26PM -0700, Allison Henderson wrote: >>>> New filtered golden output for test 252 >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Allison Henderson >>>> --- >>>> :100644 100644 930c924... fcfd121... M 252.out >>>> 252.out | 272 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------ >>>> 1 files changed, 170 insertions(+), 102 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/252.out b/252.out >>>> index 930c924..fcfd121 100644 >>>> --- a/252.out >>>> +++ b/252.out >>>> @@ -1,239 +1,307 @@ >>>> QA output created by 252 >>>> 1. into a hole >>>> +daa100df6e6711906b61c9ab5aa16032 >>>> 2. into allocated space >>>> -0: [0..7]: data >>>> +0: [0..7]: extent >>>> 1: [8..23]: hole >>>> -2: [24..39]: data >>>> +2: [24..39]: extent >>>> +cc58a7417c2d7763adc45b6fcd3fa024 >>> >>> I don't really like the way this weakens the test for XFS. With this >>> change, the test no longer is checking that unwritten extent >>> behaviour is correct. >>> >>> Rather than weakening the test, perhaps it would be better to >>> execute 252 for XFS only (with the md5sums added), and then >>> duplicate it to a new test for all filesystems to run with the >>> weaker result checking that using the new filter function gives us. >>> With the amount of common code the two tests share, it should be >>> trivial to do this.... >>> >> >> Alrighty, that sounds pretty straight forward, as long as every one >> is in agreement. I think that would help retain the tests >> effectiveness. Eric, Josef, what are your thoughts? > > Yeah, I agree, I share Dave's concerns and that sounds like a good > way to go. > > Thanks, > -Eric Ok I will get an update sent out with these adjustments, and also the checksum wrapper that Dave mentioned in the 1/3 patch. Thanks all for your reviews! Allison Henderson > >> Allison Henderson >> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Dave. >> > > _______________________________________________ > xfs mailing list > xfs@oss.sgi.com > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs