From: Ted Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: Filesystem benchmarks on reasonably fast hardware
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 17:18:10 -0400
Message-ID: <20110725211810.GL3469@thunk.org>
References: <20110717160501.GA1437@logfs.org>
 <20110718120751.GH14869@thunk.org>
 <20110718124229.GG1437@logfs.org>
 <20110725151825.GI3469@thunk.org>
 <20110725182037.GE26160@logfs.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn?= Engel <joern@logfs.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20110725182037.GE26160@logfs.org>
Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 08:20:37PM +0200, J=F6rn Engel wrote:
> On Mon, 25 July 2011 11:18:25 -0400, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> >=20
> > Did you have a chance to do an ext4 lockstat run?
>=20
> Yes, I did.  But your mails keep bouncing, so you have to look at the
> list to see it (or this mail).  Yes, I lack a proper reverse DNS
> record, as the IP belongs to my provider, not me.  Most people don't
> care, some bounce, some silently ignore my mail.  The joys of spam
> filtering.

I didn't see the ext4 lockstat on the list.  Can you resend it to
tytso@google.com or theodore.tso@gmail.com?  MIT is using an
outsourced SPAM provider (Brightmail anti-spam), and I can't do
anything about that, unfortunately.  From what I can tell the
Brightmail doesn't drop all e-mails from non-resolving IP's, but if
it's in a "bad neighborhood" (i.e., your neighbors are all spammers,
or belong to Windows users where 80% of the machines are spambots),
Brightmail is probably going to flag your mail as spam.  :-(

Thanks!

					- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" i=
n
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html