From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH XFSPROGS 2/3] Build without enabling DEBUG by default Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 12:55:17 -0400 Message-ID: <20110730165517.GA13918@infradead.org> References: <1311292237-4155-1-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu> <1311292237-4155-2-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu> <20110722141753.GA19681@infradead.org> <20110722183048.GC25092@thunk.org> <20110722183830.GA21744@infradead.org> <20110722223458.GD25092@thunk.org> <20110723013214.GA22837@infradead.org> <20110726151033.GA18311@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Ext4 Developers List , xfs@oss.sgi.com To: Ted Ts'o Return-path: Received: from 173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.166.109.252]:54821 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752088Ab1G3QzT (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Jul 2011 12:55:19 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110726151033.GA18311@infradead.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:10:33AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > This looks much better, and is indeed similar to some other fixes we > > recently had to put in, probably due to changing make behaviour. > > > > If you add a signoff and a proper description I'll put it into all the > > repositories. > > Can you at least provide the signoff? I can take care of the rest if > this means I can get it in ASAP. Ted, can you please give me a signoff for this patch? I could probably just put it in anyway given how trivial it is. But let's just stick to the proper protocol if we can.