From: Benjamin Peterson Subject: Re: Ext4 allocation strategy Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 22:18:19 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <4E452ED4.9000307@shiftmail.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:33525 "EHLO lo.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752167Ab1HLWZM (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Aug 2011 18:25:12 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qs0A8-0000IM-KG for linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org; Sat, 13 Aug 2011 00:25:08 +0200 Received: from 64-131-13-109.usfamily.net ([64.131.13.109]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 13 Aug 2011 00:25:08 +0200 Received: from benjamin by 64-131-13-109.usfamily.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 13 Aug 2011 00:25:08 +0200 Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: torn5 shiftmail.org> writes: > > So can you tell me something? You might find the comments in fs/ext4/mballoc.c helpful.