From: Ivan Shmakov Subject: e2p_blocks_count () vs. ext2fs_blocks_count () Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 10:25:19 +0700 Message-ID: <864o1at9eo.fsf@gray.siamics.net> Reply-To: Ivan Shmakov Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:55919 "EHLO lo.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751887Ab1HVDZe (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Aug 2011 23:25:34 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QvL8m-0006qt-Pw for linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 05:25:32 +0200 Received: from gray.am-1.org ([188.120.231.229]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 05:25:32 +0200 Received: from oneingray by gray.am-1.org with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 05:25:32 +0200 Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Apparently, e2p_blocks_count (), a =E2=80=98static=E2=80=99 function i= n lib/e2p/ls.c, duplicates the public ext2fs_blocks_count () one (lib/ext2fs/blknum.c) as of d4c0d8e5. The same holds for e2p_r_blocks_count () and e2p_free_blocks_count (). The code is, as it seems, exactly the same. I wonder, isn't there a problem? TIA. --=20 =46SF associate member #7257 Coming soon: Software Freedom Day http://mail.sf-day.org/lists/listinfo/ planning-ru (ru), sfd-discuss (e= n) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html