From: Li Haifeng Subject: [PATCH] fix the outdated comment in ext2_nfs_get_inode() Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 19:46:20 +0800 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Jan Kara Return-path: Received: from mail-gy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.160.174]:41469 "EHLO mail-gy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753254Ab1H3LqV (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Aug 2011 07:46:21 -0400 Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Signed-off-by: Li Haifeng --- fs/ext2/super.c | 7 +++---- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext2/super.c b/fs/ext2/super.c index 1dd62ed..bda10cf 100644 --- a/fs/ext2/super.c +++ b/fs/ext2/super.c @@ -327,10 +327,9 @@ static struct inode *ext2_nfs_get_inode(struct super_block *sb, if (ino > le32_to_cpu(EXT2_SB(sb)->s_es->s_inodes_count)) return ERR_PTR(-ESTALE); - /* iget isn't really right if the inode is currently unallocated!! - * ext2_read_inode currently does appropriate checks, but - * it might be "neater" to call ext2_get_inode first and check - * if the inode is valid..... + /* + * ext2_iget isn't really right if the inode is currently unallocated!! + * And it also does appropriate checks to handle the stale inode. */ inode = ext2_iget(sb, ino); if (IS_ERR(inode)) -- 1.7.4.1