From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] crc32c: Implement a self-test for CRC32c Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 18:24:22 -0400 Message-ID: <20110901222422.GA5771@infradead.org> References: <20110901003317.32645.16843.stgit@elm3c44.beaverton.ibm.com> <20110901003336.32645.32746.stgit@elm3c44.beaverton.ibm.com> <03ac01cc6869$9cd23b60$d676b220$@systemfabricworks.com> <20110901221854.GA12086@tux1.beaverton.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Bob Pearson , 'Andreas Dilger' , 'Herbert Xu' , 'Theodore Tso' , 'David Miller' , 'linux-kernel' , 'Mingming Cao' , 'linux-crypto' , 'linux-fsdevel' , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: "Darrick J. Wong" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110901221854.GA12086@tux1.beaverton.ibm.com> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 03:18:54PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > I suspect it would be pretty easy to adapt the Makefile to generate the > relevant .c and .h files; in particular it could be useful to use the crypto > framework for crc32 on the off chance anyone wants to provide hwaccel for that > too. crc32 or crc32c? Note that there already is a hardware optimized crc32c for recent Intel CPUs in arch/x86/crypto/crc32c-intel.c.