From: Alex Elder Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: Assume yes when test device is not partitioned Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 16:14:44 -0500 Message-ID: <1316726084.2009.85.camel@doink> References: <1315038799-2150-1-git-send-email-prasadjoshi.linux@gmail.com> Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: , Chaitanya Kulkarni , To: Prasad Joshi Return-path: Received: from relay3.sgi.com ([192.48.152.1]:46882 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753863Ab1IVVOt (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Sep 2011 17:14:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1315038799-2150-1-git-send-email-prasadjoshi.linux@gmail.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, 2011-09-03 at 14:03 +0530, Prasad Joshi wrote: > If an entire device used for file system creation, the mkfs.ext2/3/4 > asks for confirmation before proceeding. Since the device is > configured for testing it is safe to assume positive response > during mkfs. > > The patch also replaces hard coded mkfs path with MKFS_PROG variable. > > Signed-off-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni > Signed-off-by: Prasad Joshi Thanks for submitting a patch, Prasad (and Chaitanya). Can you please re-submit this? Based on feedback what we're looking for would be: [PATCH 0/2] description e-mail [PATCH 1/2] patch that substitutes /sbin/mkfs with ${MKFS_PROG} [PATCH 2/2] patch that adds a '-f' flag to ${MKFS_PROG}.${FSTYP} for all ext* filesystem types. Thanks. -Alex