From: Pekka Enberg Subject: Re: [patch 3/5] mm: try to distribute dirty pages fairly across zones Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 10:35:25 +0300 Message-ID: References: <1317367044-475-1-git-send-email-jweiner@redhat.com> <1317367044-475-4-git-send-email-jweiner@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Andrew Morton , Mel Gorman , Christoph Hellwig , Dave Chinner , Wu Fengguang , Jan Kara , Rik van Riel , Minchan Kim , Chris Mason , "Theodore Ts'o" , Andreas Dilger , Shaohua Li , xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Weiner Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1317367044-475-4-git-send-email-jweiner@redhat.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org Hi Johannes! On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Johannes Weiner wrot= e: > But there is a flaw in that we have a zoned page allocator which does > not care about the global state but rather the state of individual > memory zones. =A0And right now there is nothing that prevents one zone > from filling up with dirty pages while other zones are spared, which > frequently leads to situations where kswapd, in order to restore the > watermark of free pages, does indeed have to write pages from that > zone's LRU list. =A0This can interfere so badly with IO from the flusher > threads that major filesystems (btrfs, xfs, ext4) mostly ignore write > requests from reclaim already, taking away the VM's only possibility > to keep such a zone balanced, aside from hoping the flushers will soon > clean pages from that zone. The obvious question is: how did you test this? Can you share the results? Pekka -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org