From: "Darrick J. Wong" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] crc32: Bolt on crc32c Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 10:16:10 -0700 Message-ID: <20111026171556.GU12447@tux1.beaverton.ibm.com> References: <20111004235357.1560.12602.stgit@elm3c44.beaverton.ibm.com> <20111004235403.1560.55503.stgit@elm3c44.beaverton.ibm.com> <20111021122803.GA15803@gondor.apana.org.au> <20111021165703.GS12447@tux1.beaverton.ibm.com> <20111021191514.GA3997@gondor.apana.org.au> Reply-To: djwong@us.ibm.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Andreas Dilger , Theodore Tso , David Miller , Joakim Tjernlund , Bob Pearson , linux-kernel , Mingming Cao , linux-crypto , linux-fsdevel , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Herbert Xu To: Bob Pearson Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111021191514.GA3997@gondor.apana.org.au> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 09:15:14PM +0200, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 09:57:03AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > > > My patchset builds upon Bob Pearson's crc32 patchset from early September. Do > > my patches fail to apply after applying his patchset? > > > > Or, to speed things along, should I simply repost both Bob's and my patches as > > one big series? > > > > Bob, have you sent out a new iteration of your patches since September 6th? > > I'm fine with you pushing this through whichever tree that Bob's > patches are going through. Bob, Which tree (if any) are your patches going through? --D