From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix BUG_ON() in ext4_ext_insert_extent() for .32 longterm Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 10:42:07 -0700 Message-ID: <20111103174207.GA31834@kroah.com> References: <1317206703-5604-1-git-send-email-tm@tao.ma> <20111027094329.GB31921@thunk.org> <20111027115322.GB6379@kroah.com> <20111028023607.GA23772@gmail.com> <20111028052406.GA21306@kroah.com> <20111028084652.GA25104@gmail.com> <20111028090759.GA22822@kroah.com> <20111028123402.GA26003@gmail.com> <20111102210024.GA9949@kroah.com> <20111103030643.GA9967@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: Ted Ts'o , Tao Ma , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Xiaoyun Mao , Yingbin Wang , Jia Wan Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:44387 "EHLO out2.smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933705Ab1KCR5Y (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Nov 2011 13:57:24 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111103030643.GA9967@gmail.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 11:06:44AM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote: > On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 02:00:24PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > [snip] > > > > Sorry for dragging this out, but what commit id does this correspond to > > in Linus's tree? I can't seem to figure it out. > > > > Or does it not correspond to anything? If so, I need a sentence that > > says why it doesn't for the patch changelog. > > Hi Greg, > > This patch doesn't apply for upstream because the code has been > refactored since 3.0. Thanks for letting me know, I'll go queue this up now. greg k-h