From: Herbert Xu Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/14] crc32: Select an algorithm via kconfig Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 08:25:05 +0800 Message-ID: <20111202002505.GB19842@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <20111201201341.5876.83743.stgit@elm3c44.beaverton.ibm.com> <20111201201517.5876.39207.stgit@elm3c44.beaverton.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Andrew Morton , Theodore Tso , Joakim Tjernlund , Bob Pearson , linux-kernel , Andreas Dilger , linux-crypto , linux-fsdevel , Mingming Cao , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: "Darrick J. Wong" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111201201517.5876.39207.stgit@elm3c44.beaverton.ibm.com> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 12:15:17PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > Allow the kernel builder to choose a crc32* algorithm for the kernel. > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong I don't like this at all. How do you expect distros or indeed anyone to make this choice? For generic C implementations like this we should only have one, and not many. Cheers, -- Email: Herbert Xu Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt