From: Matt Fleming Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5 resend] Thaw the journal when you unfreeze the fs. Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 11:07:24 +0000 Message-ID: <1323169644.4838.13.camel@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1323118489-16326-1-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com> <1323118489-16326-3-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jan Kara , Alexander Viro , Andreas Dilger , Matthew Wilcox , Randy Dunlap , Theodore Tso , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Surbhi Palande , Valerie Aurora , Christopher Chaltain , "Peter M. Petrakis" , Mikulas Patocka , Surbhi Palande To: Kamal Mostafa Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1323118489-16326-3-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com> Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 12:54 -0800, Kamal Mostafa wrote: > From: Surbhi Palande > > Thaw the journal so that transactions can resume > > BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/897421 > Signed-off-by: Surbhi Palande > Cc: Kamal Mostafa > Tested-by: Peter M. Petrakis > Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa > --- > fs/ext4/super.c | 4 ++++ > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) Shouldn't this patch really be merged with [PATCH 1/5] ? Otherwise it's possible to freeze a journal that will never be unfrozen, if say, you're doing a git bisect and you have [PATCH 1/5] applied but not [PATCH 2/5]. -- Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center