From: Toshiyuki Okajima Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] ext4: allocate delalloc blocks before changing journal mode Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 12:31:31 +0900 Message-ID: <4EE18113.9060503@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <1321344474-14707-1-git-send-email-xiaoqiangnk@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: toshi.okajima@jp.fujitsu.com, tytso@mit.edu, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Yongqiang Yang Return-path: Received: from fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.36]:45504 "EHLO fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751171Ab1LID21 (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Dec 2011 22:28:27 -0500 Received: from m2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (unknown [10.0.50.72]) by fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B9FE3EE0AE for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2011 12:28:24 +0900 (JST) Received: from smail (m2 [127.0.0.1]) by outgoing.m2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 303AC45DF56 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2011 12:28:24 +0900 (JST) Received: from s2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (s2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp [10.0.50.92]) by m2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18DAB45DF55 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2011 12:28:24 +0900 (JST) Received: from s2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by s2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A6C11DB802C for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2011 12:28:24 +0900 (JST) Received: from m106.s.css.fujitsu.com (m106.s.css.fujitsu.com [10.240.81.146]) by s2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id B27D71DB803C for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2011 12:28:23 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: <1321344474-14707-1-git-send-email-xiaoqiangnk@gmail.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: (2011/11/15 17:07), Yongqiang Yang wrote: > delalloc blocks should be allocated before changing journal mode, > otherwise they can not be allocated and even more truncate on > delalloc blocks could triggre BUG by flushing delalloc buffers. > > Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Yang > --- > fs/ext4/inode.c | 11 +++++++++++ > 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c > index de05e86..384f8a7 100644 > --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c > +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c > @@ -4676,6 +4676,17 @@ int ext4_change_inode_journal_flag(struct inode *inode, int val) > return 0; > if (is_journal_aborted(journal)) > return -EROFS; > + /* We have to allocate physical blocks for delalloc blocks > + * before flushing journal. otherwise delalloc blocks can not > + * be allocated any more. even more truncate on delalloc blocks > + * could trigger BUG by flushing delalloc blocks in journal. > + * There is no delalloc block in non-journal data mode. > + */ > + if (val && test_opt(inode->i_sb, DELALLOC)) { > + err = ext4_alloc_da_blocks(inode); > + if (err < 0) > + return err; > + } > > jbd2_journal_lock_updates(journal); > jbd2_journal_flush(journal); Though I tested your patch by my reproducer that caused a panic which you pointed out, a panic did not happen. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- #!/bin/sh echo "a" > /tmp/a # file under an ext4 filesystem chattr +j /tmp/a echo "a" >> /tmp/a chattr -j /tmp/a ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- So, this patch looks good to me. Tested-by: Toshiyuki Okajima