From: Rudolf Zran Subject: Re: Restoring filenames from partly damaged ext4-filesystem Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 21:22:23 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <1328822543.65833.YahooMailNeo@web132404.mail.ird.yahoo.com> References: <1328804993.34330.YahooMailNeo@web132403.mail.ird.yahoo.com> Reply-To: Rudolf Zran Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" , "debian-user@lists.debian.org" To: Andreas Dilger Return-path: In-Reply-To: Resent-Message-ID: <1lLuznQbZxC.A._xB.KlDNPB@liszt> List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org Hello Andreas!=0A=0A=0A[ext4 partition overwritten with garbage at the begi= nning]=0A=0A=0A>> * photorec from the testdisk package recoveres, luckily!= , about 500GB of=0A>> =A0 data. Though the content seems to be pretty reas= onable, no filenames=0A>> =A0 are recovered, since photorec operates witho= ut using filesystem =0A>> =A0 knowledge.=0A>> =0A>> Do you see any chances= (besides consulting professional recovery companies)=0A>> getting the fil= enames back?=0A> =0A> There was an ext3grep tool that some people had succe= ss with, but when I=0A> looked at it, it was still fairly complex to use.= =0A=0AThanks for the hint, but the problem with ext3grep is that it seems t= o=0Arely on an intact filesystem structure. It even has no option to set=0A= another superblock besides the default one and fails with all commands=0AI = tried ( see https://pzt.me/8q6k ).=0A=0ABye, Rudolf.=0A