From: Tao Ma Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 01/22] ext4: Move extra inode read to a new function. Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:13:17 +0800 Message-ID: <4F43521D.2070401@tao.ma> References: <4F41EF95.2000909@tao.ma> <1329721316-4955-1-git-send-email-tm@tao.ma> <77C00684-DB5E-4BDC-A500-9128D8BD0BC3@dilger.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Andreas Dilger Return-path: In-Reply-To: <77C00684-DB5E-4BDC-A500-9128D8BD0BC3@dilger.ca> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On 02/21/2012 02:51 PM, Andreas Dilger wrote: > On 2012-02-20, at 12:01 AM, Tao Ma wrote: >> From: Tao Ma >> >> Currently, in ext4_iget we do a simple check to see whether >> there does exist some information starting from the end >> of i_extra_size. With inline data added, this procedure >> is more complicated. So move it to a new function named >> ext4_iget_extra_inode. >> >> Signed-off-by: Tao Ma >> --- >> fs/ext4/inode.c | 19 ++++++++++++------- >> 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c >> index feaa82f..0b2d6c1 100644 >> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c >> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c >> @@ -3610,6 +3610,16 @@ static blkcnt_t ext4_inode_blocks(struct ext4_inode *raw_inode, >> } >> } >> >> +static inline void ext4_iget_extra_inode(struct inode *inode, >> + struct ext4_inode *raw_inode, >> + struct ext4_inode_info *ei) >> +{ >> + __le32 *magic = (void *)raw_inode + >> + EXT4_GOOD_OLD_INODE_SIZE + ei->i_extra_isize; >> + if (*magic == cpu_to_le32(EXT4_XATTR_MAGIC)) >> + ext4_set_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_XATTR); >> +} > > The patch looks fine, and is a nice little cleanup, but... > >> struct inode *ext4_iget(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long ino) >> { >> struct ext4_iloc iloc; >> @@ -3720,13 +3730,8 @@ struct inode *ext4_iget(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long ino) >> /* The extra space is currently unused. Use it. */ >> ei->i_extra_isize = sizeof(struct ext4_inode) - >> EXT4_GOOD_OLD_INODE_SIZE; >> - } else { >> - __le32 *magic = (void *)raw_inode + >> - EXT4_GOOD_OLD_INODE_SIZE + >> - ei->i_extra_isize; >> - if (*magic == cpu_to_le32(EXT4_XATTR_MAGIC)) >> - ext4_set_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_XATTR); >> - } >> + } else >> + ext4_iget_extra_inode(inode, raw_inode, ei); > > This does not follow Documentation/CodingStyle - there should be braces around > the "else" clause if it is needed for the "if" clause. The below code could be > fixed at the same time. OK, I will fix it. Thanks for the review. Thanks Tao > >> } else >> ei->i_extra_isize = 0; >> >> -- >> 1.7.0.4 >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > > Cheers, Andreas > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html