From: Ted Ts'o Subject: Re: [PATCH 5 3/4] nfsd_open(): rename 'int access' to 'int may_flags' in nfsd_open() Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 10:18:16 -0500 Message-ID: <20120306151816.GB32282@thunk.org> References: <20120109132158.2616029.30467.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20120109132153.2616029.26302.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20120306000837.GA17164@thunk.org> <20120306020819.GH31388@pad.fieldses.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Bernd Schubert , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, yong.fan@whamcloud.com, sandeen@redhat.com, adilger@whamcloud.com To: "J. Bruce Fields" Return-path: Received: from li9-11.members.linode.com ([67.18.176.11]:56688 "EHLO test.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030453Ab2CFPSS (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Mar 2012 10:18:18 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120306020819.GH31388@pad.fieldses.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 09:08:19PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > Yes, that would be fine. > > (There may well be some conflict: simplest might be if you can get that > pushed out to a stable public branch somewhere, hopefully before the > merge window opens, and that'll give me a chance to pull it and handle > any merge conflicts. Are the commits you're worried about on the NFS side already in linux-next? If so, I'll do a quick test merge and see if there are any conflicts. If so, I'll segregate out these patches into a separate pre-merge branch --- and then if you like you could pull them into your branch and we can deal with it that way. - Ted