From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: [PATCH 5 3/4] nfsd_open(): rename 'int access' to 'int may_flags' in nfsd_open() Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 10:28:43 -0500 Message-ID: <20120306152842.GA8339@pad.fieldses.org> References: <20120109132158.2616029.30467.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20120109132153.2616029.26302.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20120306000837.GA17164@thunk.org> <20120306020819.GH31388@pad.fieldses.org> <20120306151816.GB32282@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Bernd Schubert , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, yong.fan@whamcloud.com, sandeen@redhat.com, adilger@whamcloud.com To: "Ted Ts'o" Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:60003 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752598Ab2CFP2s (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Mar 2012 10:28:48 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120306151816.GB32282@thunk.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 10:18:16AM -0500, Ted Ts'o wrote: > On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 09:08:19PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > Yes, that would be fine. > > > > (There may well be some conflict: simplest might be if you can get that > > pushed out to a stable public branch somewhere, hopefully before the > > merge window opens, and that'll give me a chance to pull it and handle > > any merge conflicts. > > Are the commits you're worried about on the NFS side already in > linux-next? No (though there might be some other conflicts there I haven't thought of). > If so, I'll do a quick test merge and see if there are > any conflicts. If so, I'll segregate out these patches into a > separate pre-merge branch --- and then if you like you could pull them > into your branch and we can deal with it that way. That sounds like a good way to do it regardless? --b.