From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@us.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 17/54] e2fsck: Don't verify bitmap checksums
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 15:59:11 -0800
Message-ID: <20120306235911.11945.59048.stgit@elm3b70.beaverton.ibm.com>
References: <20120306235720.11945.30629.stgit@elm3b70.beaverton.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Sunil Mushran <sunil.mushran@oracle.com>,
	Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>,
	Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	Coly Li <colyli@gmail.com>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@us.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120306235720.11945.30629.stgit@elm3b70.beaverton.ibm.com>
Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org

Since the correct inode and block bitmaps are calculated in pass 5, don't fail
the bitmap read operation in prior passes since (a) incorrect results won't
kill us and (b) if we fail early, we'll never _get_ to pass 5.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@us.ibm.com>
---
 e2fsck/util.c |    2 ++
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)


diff --git a/e2fsck/util.c b/e2fsck/util.c
index 6e3a1dc..af483fa 100644
--- a/e2fsck/util.c
+++ b/e2fsck/util.c
@@ -249,7 +249,9 @@ void e2fsck_read_bitmaps(e2fsck_t ctx)
 	old_op = ehandler_operation(_("reading inode and block bitmaps"));
 	e2fsck_set_bitmap_type(fs, EXT2FS_BMAP64_RBTREE, "fs_bitmaps",
 			       &save_type);
+	ctx->fs->flags |= EXT2_FLAG_IGNORE_CSUM_ERRORS;
 	retval = ext2fs_read_bitmaps(fs);
+	ctx->fs->flags &= ~EXT2_FLAG_IGNORE_CSUM_ERRORS;
 	fs->default_bitmap_type = save_type;
 	ehandler_operation(old_op);
 	if (retval) {