From: Yongqiang Yang Subject: Re: delayed extent tree test cases Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 13:36:09 +0800 Message-ID: References: <4F5992B6.7070105@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Ext4 Developers List To: Allison Henderson Return-path: Received: from mail-tul01m020-f174.google.com ([209.85.214.174]:42761 "EHLO mail-tul01m020-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750707Ab2CIFgK convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Mar 2012 00:36:10 -0500 Received: by obbuo6 with SMTP id uo6so1679619obb.19 for ; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 21:36:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F5992B6.7070105@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Allison Henderson wrote: > Hi Yongqiang, Hi Allison, > > I am looking for test cases to exercise your delayed extent tree patc= h set. > I am working on expanding your solution for extent locks, and it woul= d be > nice to have some sanity checks as I go along to make sure I have not= broken > it :) =A0Are there any tests in particular that you used while you we= re > developing it? =A0Thx! There is no particular tests for delayed extents tree on my hand. I just tested the patch set with xfstests. If there is any help I can provide, please tell me. Yongqiang. > > Allison Henderson > --=20 Best Wishes Yongqiang Yang -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html