From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: [PATCH 5 3/4] nfsd_open(): rename 'int access' to 'int may_flags' in nfsd_open() Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 16:34:46 -0400 Message-ID: <20120313203446.GB21991@fieldses.org> References: <20120306000837.GA17164@thunk.org> <20120306020819.GH31388@pad.fieldses.org> <20120306151816.GB32282@thunk.org> <20120306152842.GA8339@pad.fieldses.org> <20120309205148.GB5635@thunk.org> <20120312150912.GB12440@thunk.org> <20120312154921.GB17153@pad.fieldses.org> <20120312222250.GD8991@fieldses.org> <20120313200117.GA21991@fieldses.org> <4F5FA827.8020606@itwm.fraunhofer.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" , Ted Ts'o , linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-ext4-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, yong.fan-KloliPT79xf2eFz/2MeuCQ@public.gmane.org, sandeen-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, adilger-KloliPT79xf2eFz/2MeuCQ@public.gmane.org To: Bernd Schubert Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F5FA827.8020606-mPn0NPGs4xGatNDF+KUbs4QuADTiUCJX@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 09:03:51PM +0100, Bernd Schubert wrote: > On 03/13/2012 09:01 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > >On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 06:22:50PM -0400, bfields wrote: > >>On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:49:21AM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > >>>On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:09:12AM -0400, Ted Ts'o wrote: > >>>>On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 03:51:48PM -0500, Ted Ts'o wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>Linus in general doesn't like cross tree merges (or any extraneous > >>>>>merges) unless they are absolutely necessary; but then, he trusts git > >>>>>merges more than many of us do. :-) > >>>>> > >>>>>I've put the the patch series on a separate patch, with a signed tag, at: > >>>>> > >>>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4.git nfs-ext4-premerge > >>>>> > >>>>>Can you confirm that you've pulled it into your tree and it's landed > >>>>>in linux-next? I probably won't bother pulling it in mine unless > >>>>>there is definitely a merge conflict that I need to resolve. (I've > >>>>>checked and there do not appear to be any against linux-next as of > >>>>>last night.) > >>>> > >>>>Ping? > >>> > >>>Whoops, sorry. > >>> > >>>Looks perfect, thanks for handling these! > >>> > >>>I'm running them through my usual regression tests > >> > >>Urgh, I'm seeing a failure on the telldir test (part of the "special" > >>connectathon tests). I haven't looked at what it's trying to do yet. > >>Reproduceable even just on a local filesystem without NFS involved. If > >>someone wants to look at it, you can just do: > >> > >> git clone git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/cthon04.git > >> cd cthon04 > >> make > >> NFS_TESTDIR=/somewhere_on_an_ext4_fs/TMP ./runtests -s > >> > >>(Or after running that, more specifically, > >> > >> cd /somewhere_on_an_ext4_fs/TMP/ > >> ./telldir > >> > >>) > >> > >>I'll look at it tomorrow. > > > >Looks like seekdir is just not accepting an offset returned from > >getdents: > > > > openat(AT_FDCWD, "telldir-test", O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK|O_DIRECTORY|O_CLOEXEC) = 3 > > getdents(3, {...{d_ino=20386, d_off=5728083968307607285, d_reclen=24, d_name="192"}...} = 4848 > > lseek(3, 5728083968307607285, SEEK_SET) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument) > > > >Still investigating. > > Thanks! I'm also just going to work on it (just noticed your mail > while on vacation ...). OK, good. You can probably figure this out faster than me.... --b. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html