From: Yongqiang Yang Subject: Re: getdents - ext4 vs btrfs performance Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 10:48:17 +0800 Message-ID: References: <20120310044804.GB5652@thunk.org> <4F5F9A97.5060404@ubuntu.com> <20120313195339.GA24124@thunk.org> <4F5FAC9C.9070607@gmail.com> <20120313213304.GB11969@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 To: "Ted Ts'o" , Phillip Susi , Andreas Dilger , Lukas Czerner , Jacek Luczak , "linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" , linux-fsdevel , LKML , "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" Return-path: Received: from mail-gy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.160.174]:35085 "EHLO mail-gy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030391Ab2CNCsS (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Mar 2012 22:48:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20120313213304.GB11969@thunk.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: What if we use inode number as the hash value? Does it work? Yongqiang.