From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] ext4: Use pr_fmt and pr_<level>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 21:25:37 -0700
Message-ID: <1332131137.23125.44.camel@joe2Laptop>
References: <cover.1331856299.git.joe@perches.com>
	 <ceb0e02f9f0c1548a654e8718fbadc147595f8ee.1331856300.git.joe@perches.com>
	 <20120319040950.GG31682@thunk.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
To: Ted Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Return-path: <linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from perches-mx.perches.com ([206.117.179.246]:44245 "EHLO
	labridge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1754108Ab2CSEZj (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 19 Mar 2012 00:25:39 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20120319040950.GG31682@thunk.org>
Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org>

On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 00:09 -0400, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> One evidence that this patch is noise is that it doesn't apply cleanly
> just on top of my current patch set that I plan to send to Linus.

That's crap for evidence.

It's more evident that you don't make
public your own internal patch queue
quickly enough than anything else.