From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] ext4: Use pr_fmt and pr_<level>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 17:46:41 +0100
Message-ID: <4F6762F1.7050902@gmail.com>
References: <cover.1331856299.git.joe@perches.com>  <ceb0e02f9f0c1548a654e8718fbadc147595f8ee.1331856300.git.joe@perches.com>  <20120319040950.GG31682@thunk.org> <1332131137.23125.44.camel@joe2Laptop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Ted Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Return-path: <linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-wg0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:40862 "EHLO
	mail-wg0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1030563Ab2CSQqp (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>); Mon, 19 Mar 2012 12:46:45 -0400
In-Reply-To: <1332131137.23125.44.camel@joe2Laptop>
Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org>

On 03/19/2012 05:25 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 00:09 -0400, Ted Ts'o wrote:
>> One evidence that this patch is noise is that it doesn't apply cleanly
>> just on top of my current patch set that I plan to send to Linus.
> 
> That's crap for evidence.
> 
> It's more evident that you don't make
> public your own internal patch queue
> quickly enough than anything else.

Please stop repeating that shit. I already explained you the reasons. A
couple of weeks ago.

thanks,
-- 
js