From: Al Viro Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] ext4: Use pr_fmt and pr_ Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 01:46:33 +0000 Message-ID: <20120320014633.GJ6589@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20120319153133.GA2502@thunk.org> <20120319161425.GB2502@thunk.org> <20120319.141402.934377752041508724.davem@davemloft.net> <20120319183126.GA6031@thunk.org> <1332182773.3908.11.camel@joe2Laptop> <20120320010401.GA14363@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: Ted Ts'o , Joe Perches , David Miller , anca.emanuel@gmail.com, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:40745 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752616Ab2CTBqm (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Mar 2012 21:46:42 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120320010401.GA14363@thunk.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 09:04:01PM -0400, Ted Ts'o wrote: > Yes, but we can't do structured notifications with the current > pr_. So why change literally tens of thousands of callsites when > in order to really realize the full promise of structured > notifications, we'll have to change them *again*? Two words: commit count. Al, expecting a rant from mingo about inexcusable hostility to new duhvelopers any time now...