From: Jiri Slaby Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] ext4: Use pr_fmt and pr_ Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 10:25:20 +0100 Message-ID: <4F684D00.4040102@suse.cz> References: <20120319040950.GG31682@thunk.org> <1332131137.23125.44.camel@joe2Laptop> <4F6762F1.7050902@gmail.com> <1332176943.1983.28.camel@joe2Laptop> <4F684673.1050309@suse.cz> <1332235315.7847.63.camel@joe2Laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jiri Slaby , Ted Ts'o , Andreas Dilger , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Joe Perches Return-path: Received: from mail-bk0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:48946 "EHLO mail-bk0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753306Ab2CTJZY (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Mar 2012 05:25:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1332235315.7847.63.camel@joe2Laptop> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 03/20/2012 10:21 AM, Joe Perches wrote: > On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 09:57 +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote: >> And BTW setting the argument that it is a newer interface (that is what >> ath5k pr_* conversion patches commit log says) is not a good >> justification at all. > > No again, the ath5k pr_ conversion patches are to > standardize prefixes and to reduce code size by > centralizing tests. What is the "standard" prefix? > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/18/121 > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/18/123 > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/18/124 > > I happen to like 30K/10+% code size reductions. Obvious question: what speed reduction does this bring? thanks, -- js suse labs