From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext2: No longer export ext2_fs.h to user space Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 15:16:37 -0700 Message-ID: <4F6E47C5.6040306@zytor.com> References: <20120322183135.GC4028@thunk.org> <1332494856-31943-1-git-send-email-thierry.reding@avionic-design.de> <20120323131331.GA29631@thunk.org> <20120323175534.GI6589@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20120324215152.GA32554@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Ted Ts'o" , Al Viro , Thierry Reding , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara , Artem Bityutskiy , Andreas Dilger , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120324215152.GA32554@thunk.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On 03/24/2012 02:51 PM, Ted Ts'o wrote: > Peter, > > Note that we are planning on unexporting ext2_fs.h, and then utterly > removing it from the tree (with what fs/ext2 needs being moved to > fs/ext2/ext2.h). > > Someone who was compiling "the latest version" of syslinux has > submitted a kernel bugzilla entry that this was breaking due to > ext2_fs.h using umode_t which was no longer being exported by the > kernel header files. Given that ext2_fs.h is about to go ***poof*** > (Al already has the changes in his vfs git tree), I thought I should > give you a heads up.... > Thanks. Syslinux already includes a private copy of ext2_fs.h, but I need to scrub the umode_t inclusion. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.