From: Roland McGrath Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Extended file stat system call Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:32:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20120419163238.61D382C0DF@topped-with-meat.com> References: <20120419140558.17272.74360.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, wine-devel@winehq.org, kfm-devel@kde.org, nautilus-list@gnome.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org To: David Howells Return-path: In-Reply-To: David Howells's message of Thursday, 19 April 2012 15:05:58 +0100 <20120419140558.17272.74360.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org I have no comment on the functionality. But "xstat" is probably a poor choice of name. There is precedent for that function name with different meaning in the userland APIs. (It's a moderately useless meaning inherited from SVR4, but regardless overloading a name previously used is unwise.) Thanks, Roland