From: David Howells Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Extended file stat system call Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 10:51:38 +0100 Message-ID: <10044.1336643498@redhat.com> References: <20120428005856.GI9541@dastard> <20120427010610.GE9541@dastard> <20120419140558.17272.74360.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <4111.1335519545@redhat.com> <20120427131306.GG9541@dastard> Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Andreas Dilger , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, wine-devel@winehq.org, kfm-devel@kde.org, nautilus-list@gnome.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org To: Dave Chinner Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120428005856.GI9541@dastard> List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org Dave Chinner wrote: > st_blksize - file block size > st_alloc_blksize - allocation block size/alignment > st_small_io_size - IO size/alignment that avoids > filesystem/page cache RMW > st_preferred_io_size - preferred IO size for general > usage. > st_large_io_size - IO size/alignment for high > bandwidth sequential IO What is st_blksize here? Is it directly comparable (if such a thing is possible) to st_blksize in struct stat? Or does st_preferred_io_size map to the current st_blksize and your st_blksize map to actual media block size (and if so, is that the same as st_alloc_blksize? - I presume st_alloc_blksize must be a multiple of the media block size). David