From: Chris Samuel Subject: Re: How can btrfs take 23sec to stat 23K files from an SSD? Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:36:22 +1000 Message-ID: <5018CE66.6050609@csamuel.org> References: <201207222135.11159.Martin@lichtvoll.de> <20120202124241.GW16796@shiny> <20120718220446.GB3888@merlins.org> <20120722185848.GA10089@merlins.org> <201207222135.11159.Martin@lichtvoll.de> <20120722204428.GC3925@merlins.org> <20120722224145.GC12951@merlins.org> <20120723064202.GB6931@merlins.org> <20120727110835.GA6933@shiny> <20120727184238.GA6713@merlins.org> <20120801060135.GH12695@merlins.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Chris Mason , "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" , Ted Ts'o , =?windows-1252?Q?Luk=E1=9A_Czerner?= , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk, Milan Broz To: Marc MERLIN Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120801060135.GH12695@merlins.org> Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On 01/08/12 16:01, Marc MERLIN wrote: > Third, A freshly made ntfs filesystem through fuse is actually FASTER! Could it be that Samsungs FTL has optimisations in it for NTFS ? A horrible thought, but not impossible.. -- Chris Samuel : http://www.csamuel.org/ : Melbourne, VIC