From: Boaz Harrosh Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] exofs: remove lock/unlock super Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 15:32:00 +0300 Message-ID: <502CE840.4060802@panasas.com> References: <502CC4AA.6040702@gmail.com> <1345119652.3393.220.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Marco Stornelli , , , Andrew Morton , , , , , Al Viro , , , , Linux Kernel , , Linux FS Devel To: Return-path: Received: from natasha.panasas.com ([67.152.220.90]:34384 "EHLO natasha.panasas.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754121Ab2HPMdC (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Aug 2012 08:33:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1345119652.3393.220.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 08/16/2012 03:20 PM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 12:00 +0200, Marco Stornelli wrote: >> From: Marco Stornelli >> >> Remove lock and unlock super operation. >> >> Signed-off-by: Marco Stornelli > > Acked-by: Artem Bityutskiy > Are you sure? It used to be that exofs_sync_fs() could be called concurrently. What about two "bash -c sync" calls or a sync and an unmount in parallel. anything protecting that? If so then sure, but please let me test first. Boaz