From: Theodore Ts'o Subject: Re: NULL pointer dereference in ext4_ext_remove_space on 3.5.1 Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 19:11:44 -0400 Message-ID: <20120817231144.GC573@thunk.org> References: <20120816024654.GB3781@thunk.org> <20120816111051.GA16036@localhost> <20120816152513.GA31346@thunk.org> <20120817060110.GA28786@localhost> <20120817131558.GA11439@thunk.org> <20120817174841.GA4519@infradead.org> <20120817203438.GA573@thunk.org> <20120817210527.GA22716@infradead.org> <20120817225524.GA19235@dastard> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com, ext4 hackers To: Dave Chinner Return-path: Received: from li9-11.members.linode.com ([67.18.176.11]:45378 "EHLO imap.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756814Ab2HQXLt (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Aug 2012 19:11:49 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120817225524.GA19235@dastard> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 08:55:24AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > No. The whole point of moving to multiple directories is to allow > easy extension for domain specific tests without having to hack up > the check script or play other games with test naming. Duplicate > names in different test subdirectories are most certainly allowed. Oh, I agree, using separate directories is *way* better than the hack we're using internally. The main benefit of what we did was the patches were minimally intrusive.... > > Can you take a look at Dave's series if that helps you? I haven't > > really reviewed it much myself yet, but I'll try to get to it ASAP. > > Well, I'd apprepciate it if somebody looked at it. It's been almost > a month since I posted it and all I've heard is crickets so far... I definitely want to look at it, but realistically, I probably won't have time until after San Diego.... I've been crazy busy lately. Cheers, - Ted