From: Yongqiang Yang Subject: Re: [PATCH] resize2fs: support online-resizing for meta_bg and 64bits features Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 10:01:45 +0800 Message-ID: References: <1346579549-25122-1-git-send-email-xiaoqiangnk@gmail.com> <20120903164525.GD5066@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: "Theodore Ts'o" Return-path: Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f46.google.com ([209.85.215.46]:39050 "EHLO mail-lpp01m010-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754492Ab2IDCCG (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Sep 2012 22:02:06 -0400 Received: by lagy9 with SMTP id y9so3863693lag.19 for ; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 19:02:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120903164525.GD5066@thunk.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 06:31:19PM +0800, Yongqiang Yang wrote: >> Hi Ted, >> >> I noticed that you send out the patch enabling resizing on >> filesystems with meta_bg and 64bits, so I send out the corresponding >> patch on e2fsprogs. Unfortunately, there is still a bug in e2fsprogs >> as my last email says. > > The following two patches were sufficient for me to resize a test file > system from 14 TB to 18 TB. We still need to handle automatic > enabling of the meta_bg flag in resize2fs, but this should be > sufficient for more adventurous folks to test the online resize > patches. (Note that I also posted a v2 version of patch 5/5 which > fixed a number of 64-bit overflow bugs that I found in my testing.) Great! I have emailed Kevin Liao who tested my patches before to have a try. Thanks, Yongqiang. > > - Ted -- Best Wishes Yongqiang Yang