From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: Anyone have test cases for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA?
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 14:42:01 -0400
Message-ID: <20120918184201.GD28689@thunk.org>
References: <nsxa9wojdcd.fsf@closure.thunk.org>
 <20120918064039.GS11511@dastard>
 <50588898.6050802@sgi.com>
 <20120918181556.GC28689@thunk.org>
 <20120918182841.GA3343@sgi.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	xfs@oss.sgi.com
To: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20120918182841.GA3343@sgi.com>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 01:28:41PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote:
> Your impression is just a few days out of date.  See:
> 
> http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2012-09/msg00156.html

On a unrelated note, has there been any thought about potentially
setting up a separate mailing list dedicated for xfstests?  I'm not
subscribed to the xfs mailing list, mainly because I was trying to
avoid adding yet another high volume mailing list to my inbox
(although to be fair, I guess it's only 25 messages per day even on
the busiest days), and so I've missed out on review of Dave's changes
to break out the tests into hierarchies, etc.  I wonder if there are
other xfstests users that aren't yet subscribed to the xfs mailing
list who would if there was a separate mailing list.

Not a big deal; if people really don't want a separate mailing list, I
guess I could subscribe to the xfs list as well...

      	      		       	   - Ted