From: Ben Myers Subject: Re: Anyone have test cases for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA? Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 14:03:45 -0500 Message-ID: <20120918190345.GU3274@sgi.com> References: <20120918064039.GS11511@dastard> <50588898.6050802@sgi.com> <20120918181556.GC28689@thunk.org> <20120918182841.GA3343@sgi.com> <20120918184201.GD28689@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Mark Tinguely , xfs@oss.sgi.com To: Theodore Ts'o Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120918184201.GD28689@thunk.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org Hey Ted, On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 02:42:01PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 01:28:41PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote: > > Your impression is just a few days out of date. See: > > > > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2012-09/msg00156.html > > On a unrelated note, has there been any thought about potentially > setting up a separate mailing list dedicated for xfstests? You might even be the first person to suggest that. ;) > I'm not > subscribed to the xfs mailing list, mainly because I was trying to > avoid adding yet another high volume mailing list to my inbox > (although to be fair, I guess it's only 25 messages per day even on > the busiest days), and so I've missed out on review of Dave's changes > to break out the tests into hierarchies, etc. I wonder if there are > other xfstests users that aren't yet subscribed to the xfs mailing > list who would if there was a separate mailing list. > > Not a big deal; if people really don't want a separate mailing list, I > guess I could subscribe to the xfs list as well... I think it's worth discussing and I'm not resistant to a separate list. But like you said, xfs@oss.sgi.com isn't extremely high volume. Maybe a filter for xfstests in the subject would be good enough for your purposes? Regards, Ben