From: Theodore Ts'o Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/8 v2] ext4: extent status tree (step 1) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 20:02:17 -0400 Message-ID: <20120922000217.GB27207@thunk.org> References: <1345615545-26133-1-git-send-email-wenqing.lz@taobao.com> <20120920144126.GA22334@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Allison Henderson , Zheng Liu , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Zheng Liu To: Yongqiang Yang Return-path: Received: from li9-11.members.linode.com ([67.18.176.11]:51980 "EHLO imap.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753744Ab2IVACZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Sep 2012 20:02:25 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:19:54AM +0800, Yongqiang Yang wrote: > Hi Ted, > > I notices you cares Signed-off line, so I just throw a message. > > I noticed you changed all Signed-off line of patches, some patches are > written by me initially and is modified by Allison and Zheng. So I > think Signed-off line should be me, Allison and Zheng. Do I > misunderstand the rules? Thanks, I didn't realize that you and Allison had written parts of the patches. Yes, in that case it should be "Signed-off-by". I've made this change to my tree. (And this is why I don't cast commits into stone for a few days before I advance the master branch pointer.) - Ted