From: Theodore Ts'o Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/8 v2] ext4: initialize extent status tree Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 23:46:37 -0400 Message-ID: <20120926034637.GF11468@thunk.org> References: <1345615545-26133-1-git-send-email-wenqing.lz@taobao.com> <1345615545-26133-4-git-send-email-wenqing.lz@taobao.com> <20120919190541.GE28470@thunk.org> <20120925124252.GA1518@gmail.com> <20120925205921.GA8625@thunk.org> <20120926020955.GA4101@gmail.com> <20120926024745.GA11468@thunk.org> <20120926032426.GA496@gmail.com> <20120926033740.GC11468@thunk.org> <20120926035448.GA14544@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Yongqiang Yang , Allison Henderson , Zheng Liu Return-path: Received: from li9-11.members.linode.com ([67.18.176.11]:52394 "EHLO imap.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751222Ab2IZDql (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Sep 2012 23:46:41 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120926035448.GA14544@gmail.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 11:54:48AM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote: > > Before this weekend, I can finish a new patch set with (1) adding a sanity > check and (2) fixing bigalloc bug. For adding a new lock, it is > unstable now. So this lock will not be included in this patch set. That sounds good to me. Adding a rw lock is something we can do in a separate patch (which might not make the merge window for 3.7, depending on when Linus decides to release 3.6, but that's OK). - Ted