From: Theodore Ts'o Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/8 v2] ext4: initialize extent status tree Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 23:07:59 -0400 Message-ID: <20120929030759.GA12136@thunk.org> References: <20120919190541.GE28470@thunk.org> <20120925124252.GA1518@gmail.com> <20120925205921.GA8625@thunk.org> <20120926020955.GA4101@gmail.com> <20120926024745.GA11468@thunk.org> <20120926032426.GA496@gmail.com> <20120926033740.GC11468@thunk.org> <20120928072714.GA8544@gmail.com> <20120928174233.GB887@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , Yongqiang Yang , Allison Henderson , Zheng Liu To: Zheng Liu Return-path: Received: from li9-11.members.linode.com ([67.18.176.11]:52928 "EHLO imap.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754867Ab2I2DII (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Sep 2012 23:08:08 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 08:54:47AM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote: > > When I try to fix the bigalloc bug, some code that operates on extent > status tree and maintains its status are changed when I do some changes in > ext4_find_delalloc_range(). So that quite has a lot of changes I thought > in the whole patch series. So I think that we'd better drop this patch set > from dev branch. Thanks. OK, dropped. - Ted