From: Jan Kara Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] vfs: Handle O_SYNC AIO DIO in generic code properly Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 22:37:32 +0100 Message-ID: <20121121213732.GG30250@quack.suse.cz> References: <20121120074116.24645.36369.stgit@blackbox.djwong.org> <20121120074123.24645.41965.stgit@blackbox.djwong.org> <20121121100809.GE23339@infradead.org> <20121121182901.GA4519@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, xfs@oss.sgi.com, tytso@mit.edu, "Darrick J. Wong" , bpm@sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Moyer , viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121121182901.GA4519@infradead.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Wed 21-11-12 13:29:01, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 11:58:05AM -0500, Jeff Moyer wrote: > > > I'd like to use this as a vehicle to revisit how dio completions work. > > > > I don't like the sound of that. ;-) It sounds like this bugfix may get > > further delayed by the desire for unrelated code cleanup. > > I've got a prototype that isn't much more invasive than the current > series. I'll finish it up and run it through QA and will post it > tomorrow. Great, I wanted to have a look into it but you beat me to it ;) Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs