From: Jeffrey Ellis Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] vfs: Handle O_SYNC AIO DIO in generic code properly Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 18:09:48 -0500 Message-ID: <293D7CE0-C899-43F8-B04E-EB31100C8888@dhnet.us> References: <20121120074116.24645.36369.stgit@blackbox.djwong.org> <20121120074123.24645.41965.stgit@blackbox.djwong.org> <20121121100809.GE23339@infradead.org> <20121121182901.GA4519@infradead.org> <20121121213732.GG30250@quack.suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Christoph Hellwig , "axboe@kernel.dk" , "xfs@oss.sgi.com" , "tytso@mit.edu" , "Darrick J. Wong" , "bpm@sgi.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Jeff Moyer , "viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk" , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , "jack@suse.cz" , "linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" To: Jan Kara Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20121121213732.GG30250@quack.suse.cz> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org Best, J. On Nov 21, 2012, at 4:37 PM, Jan Kara wrote: > On Wed 21-11-12 13:29:01, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 11:58:05AM -0500, Jeff Moyer wrote: >>>> I'd like to use this as a vehicle to revisit how dio completions work. >>> >>> I don't like the sound of that. ;-) It sounds like this bugfix may get >>> further delayed by the desire for unrelated code cleanup. >> >> I've got a prototype that isn't much more invasive than the current >> series. I'll finish it up and run it through QA and will post it >> tomorrow. > Great, I wanted to have a look into it but you beat me to it ;) > > Honza > -- > Jan Kara > SUSE Labs, CR > > _______________________________________________ > xfs mailing list > xfs@oss.sgi.com > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs