From: Theodore Ts'o Subject: Re: ext4 xfstests-bld results for 3.8-rc6 on Pandaboard ES Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 22:48:18 -0500 Message-ID: <20130211034818.GB14298@thunk.org> References: <20130207220536.GA16092@wallace> <20130208035547.GA19703@gmail.com> <20130211013523.GD10801@thunk.org> <20130211020836.GC13161@thunk.org> <20130211032451.GA14298@thunk.org> <4D4DE7C7-35AE-4D26-9283-DA489CC449A4@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Eric Whitney , "linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" To: "gnehzuil.liu" Return-path: Received: from li9-11.members.linode.com ([67.18.176.11]:47833 "EHLO imap.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751715Ab3BKDsV (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Feb 2013 22:48:21 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D4DE7C7-35AE-4D26-9283-DA489CC449A4@gmail.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 11:36:17AM +0800, gnehzuil.liu wrote: > > Sorry, I haven't xfstests code in my hand, but I remember that #255 > is used to test hole punching feature. So I suspect that no extents > is the root cause because my patch set of indirect-based hole > punching will cause it failed. Ah, thanks for pointing that out. I'll take a closer look tomorrow, but I'm sure you're correct. I hope you've been enojoying a good Chinese New Year's vacation; thanks for checking in during your holiday. Cheers, - Ted