From: "Darrick J. Wong" Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] ubifs: Wait for page writeback to provide stable pages Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 19:48:34 -0800 Message-ID: <20130221034834.GA4055@blackbox.djwong.org> References: <20130119011231.20902.55954.stgit@blackbox.djwong.org> <20130119011316.20902.56721.stgit@blackbox.djwong.org> <20130123134312.b69c53cd.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, lucho@ionkov.net, jack@suse.cz, ericvh@gmail.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, rminnich@sandia.gov, tytso@mit.edu, martin.petersen@oracle.com, Artem Bityutskiy , neilb@suse.de, Adrian Hunter , david@fromorbit.com, gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, bharrosh@panasas.com, jlayton@samba.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp To: Andrew Morton Return-path: Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:46011 "EHLO aserp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752582Ab3BUDuM (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:50:12 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130123134312.b69c53cd.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 01:43:12PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 17:13:16 -0800 > "Darrick J. Wong" wrote: > > > When stable pages are required, we have to wait if the page is just > > going to disk and we want to modify it. Add proper callback to > > ubifs_vm_page_mkwrite(). > > > > CC: Artem Bityutskiy > > CC: Adrian Hunter > > CC: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org > > From: Jan Kara > > Signed-off-by: Jan Kara > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong > > A couple of these patches had this From:Jan strangely embedded in the > signoff area. I have assumed that they were indeed authored by Jan. > > Please note that authorship is indicated by putting the From: line > right at the start of the chagnelog. > > > I grabbed the patches. They should appear in linux-next tomorrow if I > can get the current pooppile to build. Well... these patches have been banging around in -next for a month or so now. As far as I know there haven't been any complaints. Can we push these for 3.9? --D