From: Ben Myers Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] xfstests: Stress tests improments v5 Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 17:00:07 -0600 Message-ID: <20130225230007.GJ30652@sgi.com> References: <1361356935-29153-1-git-send-email-dmonakhov@openvz.org> <20130225154512.GA32171@thunk.org> <20130225212811.GY22182@sgi.com> <20130225220941.GH5551@dastard> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Theodore Ts'o , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, Dmitry Monakhov , dchinner@redhat.com To: Dave Chinner Return-path: Received: from relay1.sgi.com ([192.48.179.29]:50698 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752513Ab3BYXAJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2013 18:00:09 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130225220941.GH5551@dastard> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 09:09:41AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 03:28:11PM -0600, Ben Myers wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:45:12AM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > > Hi, what's the status of this patch series? It looks like Dmitry has > > > responded to all of Dave's concerns --- is that correct? > > > > > > Is there anything else we need to do before these patches get merged > > > into the xfstests git tree? > > > > I think we just need a review to see if Dave's concerns have been addressed and > > then we're ready to go. > > That doesn't stop anyone else from reviewing it. Yes. Anyone is welcome to extend a Reviewed-by. ;) -Ben