From: Theodore Ts'o Subject: Re: torrent hash failures since 3.9.0-rc1 Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 09:28:11 -0400 Message-ID: <20130312132811.GI18595@thunk.org> References: <20130311204625.GA433@x4> <20130311211833.GC15478@thunk.org> <20130311213837.GA438@x4> <20130311231227.GA319@x4> <20130312030057.GA6142@gmail.com> <20130312033054.GB18595@thunk.org> <20130312061624.GA436@x4> <20130312064449.GA8806@gmail.com> <20130312064810.GA426@x4> <20130312071606.GA8900@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: Markus Trippelsdorf , Dave Jones , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Zheng Liu Return-path: Received: from li9-11.members.linode.com ([67.18.176.11]:52839 "EHLO imap.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751868Ab3CLN2S (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Mar 2013 09:28:18 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130312071606.GA8900@gmail.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 03:16:06PM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote: > > Ted, I am wandering if we need to Cc this patch to stable kernel. We > don't receive any report to complaint it, though, but it is worth > backporting it I think. I'll check, bu I suspect it will require an explicit backport; it's not going to apply cleanly automatically, will it? (i.e., if we include cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, are there some prerequisite patches that will also have to be backported, and/or we will need manually fix up patch conflicts, right?) - Ted