From: Andrey Sidorov Subject: [PATCH V3] ext4: speed-up releasing blocks on commit Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 23:26:58 +0400 Message-ID: <1364498818-17909-1-git-send-email-qrxd43@motorola.com> To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from exprod5og114.obsmtp.com ([64.18.0.28]:33582 "EHLO exprod5og114.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751279Ab3C1T1I (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Mar 2013 15:27:08 -0400 Received: from il93mgrg01.am.mot-mobility.com ([10.176.130.20]) by il93mgrg01.am.mot-mobility.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r2SJFXg1026431 for ; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 15:15:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail-la0-f43.google.com (mail-la0-f43.google.com [209.85.215.43]) by il93mgrg01.am.mot-mobility.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r2SJFKbx026318 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 15:15:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-la0-f43.google.com with SMTP id ek20so18445141lab.30 for ; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 12:27:05 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Improve mb_free_blocks speed by clearing entire range at once instead of iterating over each bit. Freeing block-by-block also makes buddy bitmap subtree flip twice making most of the work a no-op. Very few bits in buddy bitmap require change, e.g. freeing entire group is a 1 bit flip only. As a result, releasing blocks of 60G file now takes 5ms instead of 2.7s. This is especially good for non-preemptive kernels as there is no rescheduling during release. Signed-off-by: Andrey Sidorov --- fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 233 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 172 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c index 580aada..f92e05a 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c @@ -405,6 +405,12 @@ static inline void mb_clear_bit(int bit, void *addr) ext4_clear_bit(bit, addr); } +static inline int mb_test_and_clear_bit(int bit, void *addr) +{ + addr = mb_correct_addr_and_bit(&bit, addr); + return ext4_test_and_clear_bit(bit, addr); +} + static inline int mb_find_next_zero_bit(void *addr, int max, int start) { int fix = 0, ret, tmpmax; @@ -764,6 +770,24 @@ void ext4_mb_generate_buddy(struct super_block *sb, spin_unlock(&EXT4_SB(sb)->s_bal_lock); } +static void mb_regenerate_buddy(struct ext4_buddy *e4b) +{ + int count; + int order = 1; + void *buddy; + + while ((buddy = mb_find_buddy(e4b, order++, &count))) { + ext4_set_bits(buddy, 0, count); + } + e4b->bd_info->bb_fragments = 0; + memset(e4b->bd_info->bb_counters, 0, + sizeof(*e4b->bd_info->bb_counters) * + (e4b->bd_sb->s_blocksize_bits + 2)); + + ext4_mb_generate_buddy(e4b->bd_sb, e4b->bd_buddy, + e4b->bd_bitmap, e4b->bd_group); +} + /* The buddy information is attached the buddy cache inode * for convenience. The information regarding each group * is loaded via ext4_mb_load_buddy. The information involve @@ -1246,6 +1270,33 @@ static void mb_clear_bits(void *bm, int cur, int len) } } +/* clear bits in given range + * will return first found zero bit if any, -1 otherwise + */ +static int mb_test_and_clear_bits(void *bm, int cur, int len) +{ + __u32 *addr; + int zero_bit = -1; + + len = cur + len; + while (cur < len) { + if ((cur & 31) == 0 && (len - cur) >= 32) { + /* fast path: clear whole word at once */ + addr = bm + (cur >> 3); + if (*addr != (__u32)(-1) && zero_bit == -1) + zero_bit = cur + mb_find_next_zero_bit(addr, 32, 0); + *addr = 0; + cur += 32; + continue; + } + if (!mb_test_and_clear_bit(cur, bm) && zero_bit == -1) + zero_bit = cur; + cur++; + } + + return zero_bit; +} + void ext4_set_bits(void *bm, int cur, int len) { __u32 *addr; @@ -1264,17 +1315,90 @@ void ext4_set_bits(void *bm, int cur, int len) } } +/* + * _________________________________________________________________ */ + +static inline int mb_buddy_adjust_border(int* bit, void* bitmap, int side) +{ + if (mb_test_bit(*bit + side, bitmap)) { + mb_clear_bit(*bit, bitmap); + (*bit) -= side; + return 1; + } + else { + (*bit) += side; + mb_set_bit(*bit, bitmap); + return -1; + } +} + +static void mb_buddy_mark_free(struct ext4_buddy *e4b, int first, int last) +{ + int max; + int order = 1; + void *buddy = mb_find_buddy(e4b, order, &max); + + while (buddy) { + void *buddy2; + + /* Bits in range [first; last] are known to be set since + * corresponding blocks were allocated. Bits in range + * (first; last) will stay set because they form buddies on + * upper layer. We just deal with borders if they don't + * align with upper layer and then go up. + * Releasing entire group is all about clearing + * single bit of highest order buddy. + */ + + /* Example: + * --------------------------------- + * | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | + * --------------------------------- + * | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | + * --------------------------------- + * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 + * \_____________________/ + * + * Neither [1] nor [6] is aligned to above layer. + * Left neighbour [0] is free, so mark it busy, + * decrease bb_counters and extend range to + * [0; 6] + * Right neighbour [7] is busy. It can't be coaleasced with [6], so + * mark [6] free, increase bb_counters and shrink range to + * [0; 5]. + * Then shift range to [0; 2], go up and do the same. + */ + + + if (first & 1) + e4b->bd_info->bb_counters[order] += mb_buddy_adjust_border(&first, buddy, -1); + if (!(last & 1)) + e4b->bd_info->bb_counters[order] += mb_buddy_adjust_border(&last, buddy, 1); + if (first > last) + break; + order++; + + if (first == last || !(buddy2 = mb_find_buddy(e4b, order, &max))) { + mb_clear_bits(buddy, first, last - first + 1); + e4b->bd_info->bb_counters[order - 1] += last - first + 1; + break; + } + first >>= 1; + last >>= 1; + buddy = buddy2; + } +} + static void mb_free_blocks(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_buddy *e4b, - int first, int count) + int first, int count) { - int block = 0; - int max = 0; - int order; - void *buddy; - void *buddy2; + int left_is_free = 0; + int right_is_free = 0; + int block; + int last = first + count - 1; struct super_block *sb = e4b->bd_sb; - BUG_ON(first + count > (sb->s_blocksize << 3)); + BUG_ON(last >= (sb->s_blocksize << 3)); assert_spin_locked(ext4_group_lock_ptr(sb, e4b->bd_group)); mb_check_buddy(e4b); mb_free_blocks_double(inode, e4b, first, count); @@ -1283,67 +1407,54 @@ static void mb_free_blocks(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_buddy *e4b, if (first < e4b->bd_info->bb_first_free) e4b->bd_info->bb_first_free = first; - /* let's maintain fragments counter */ + /* access memory sequentially: check left neighbour, + * clear range and then check right neighbour + */ if (first != 0) - block = !mb_test_bit(first - 1, e4b->bd_bitmap); - if (first + count < EXT4_SB(sb)->s_mb_maxs[0]) - max = !mb_test_bit(first + count, e4b->bd_bitmap); - if (block && max) - e4b->bd_info->bb_fragments--; - else if (!block && !max) - e4b->bd_info->bb_fragments++; - - /* let's maintain buddy itself */ - while (count-- > 0) { - block = first++; - order = 0; - - if (!mb_test_bit(block, e4b->bd_bitmap)) { - ext4_fsblk_t blocknr; - - blocknr = ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, e4b->bd_group); - blocknr += EXT4_C2B(EXT4_SB(sb), block); - ext4_grp_locked_error(sb, e4b->bd_group, - inode ? inode->i_ino : 0, - blocknr, - "freeing already freed block " - "(bit %u)", block); - } - mb_clear_bit(block, e4b->bd_bitmap); - e4b->bd_info->bb_counters[order]++; - - /* start of the buddy */ - buddy = mb_find_buddy(e4b, order, &max); + left_is_free = !mb_test_bit(first - 1, e4b->bd_bitmap); + block = mb_test_and_clear_bits(e4b->bd_bitmap, first, count); + if (last + 1 < EXT4_SB(sb)->s_mb_maxs[0]) + right_is_free = !mb_test_bit(last + 1, e4b->bd_bitmap); - do { - block &= ~1UL; - if (mb_test_bit(block, buddy) || - mb_test_bit(block + 1, buddy)) - break; + if (unlikely(block != -1)) { + ext4_fsblk_t blocknr; - /* both the buddies are free, try to coalesce them */ - buddy2 = mb_find_buddy(e4b, order + 1, &max); + blocknr = ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, e4b->bd_group); + blocknr += EXT4_C2B(EXT4_SB(sb), block); + ext4_grp_locked_error(sb, e4b->bd_group, + inode ? inode->i_ino : 0, + blocknr, + "freeing already freed block " + "(bit %u)", block); + mb_regenerate_buddy(e4b); + goto done; + } - if (!buddy2) - break; + /* let's maintain fragments counter */ + if (left_is_free && right_is_free) + e4b->bd_info->bb_fragments--; + else if (!left_is_free && !right_is_free) + e4b->bd_info->bb_fragments++; - if (order > 0) { - /* for special purposes, we don't set - * free bits in bitmap */ - mb_set_bit(block, buddy); - mb_set_bit(block + 1, buddy); - } - e4b->bd_info->bb_counters[order]--; - e4b->bd_info->bb_counters[order]--; + /* buddy[0] == bd_bitmap is a special case, so handle + * it right away and let mb_buddy_mark_free stay free of + * zero order checks. + * Check if neighbours are to be coaleasced, + * adjust bitmap bb_counters and borders appropriately. + */ + if (first & 1) { + first += !left_is_free; + e4b->bd_info->bb_counters[0] += left_is_free ? -1 : 1; + } + if (!(last & 1)) { + last -= !right_is_free; + e4b->bd_info->bb_counters[0] += right_is_free ? -1 : 1; + } - block = block >> 1; - order++; - e4b->bd_info->bb_counters[order]++; + if (first <= last) + mb_buddy_mark_free(e4b, first >> 1, last >> 1); - mb_clear_bit(block, buddy2); - buddy = buddy2; - } while (1); - } +done: mb_set_largest_free_order(sb, e4b->bd_info); mb_check_buddy(e4b); } -- 1.7.10.4