From: Dmitry Monakhov Subject: [PATCH 1/2] xfstests: dump _require_fio output to log Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 15:09:47 +0400 Message-ID: <1366024188-21756-1-git-send-email-dmonakhov@openvz.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Dmitry Monakhov , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, dchinner@redhat.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com Return-path: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org This should helps to find incompatibility issues. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov --- common/rc | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) mode change 100644 => 100755 tests/ext4/301 diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc index 09fb83f..ad3e378 100644 --- a/common/rc +++ b/common/rc @@ -1967,8 +1967,8 @@ _require_fio() return 1; fi - $FIO_PROG --warnings-fatal --showcmd $job >/dev/null 2>&1 - [ $? -eq 0 ] || _notrun "$FIO_PROG too old" + $FIO_PROG --warnings-fatal --showcmd $job >> $seqres.full 2>&1 + [ $? -eq 0 ] || _notrun "$FIO_PROG too old, see $seqres.full" } # Does freeze work on this fs? diff --git a/tests/ext4/301 b/tests/ext4/301 old mode 100644 new mode 100755 -- 1.7.1 _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs