From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86: make DR*_RESERVED unsigned long Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 10:43:50 -0700 Message-ID: <517D5FD6.9070009@zytor.com> References: <20130424170702.GA1867@redhat.com> <5178282D.9030902@zytor.com> <20130425144818.GA25921@redhat.com> <20130426163802.GA30351@redhat.com> <517AAED5.7040400@zytor.com> <20130426171526.GA30875@redhat.com> <20130427144537.GA24256@redhat.com> <20130428005814.GB10354@somewhere> <20130428172731.GA26169@redhat.com> <517D5D3A.8070505@zytor.com> <20130428173932.GA30773@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Frederic Weisbecker , Ingo Molnar , Linus Torvalds , Cyrill Gorcunov , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , David Miller , "Theodore Ts'o" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , the arch/x86 maintainers , Network Development , "linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" To: Oleg Nesterov Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130428173932.GA30773@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On 04/28/2013 10:39 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 04/28, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> >> On 04/28/2013 10:27 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote: >> >> Looks good. However, given the timing, I would think this is 3.11 >> material unless we have a manifest bug at this point. > > Yes, yes, this is only cleanup. > Thanks for tackling it. I just wanted to make sure you didn't wonder why I didn't want to push it for 3.10. -hpa