From: Theodore Ts'o Subject: Re: checksums Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 09:18:30 -0400 Message-ID: <20130514131830.GA19563@thunk.org> References: <20130514091407.GC2041@belle.intranet.vanheusden.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: folkert Return-path: Received: from li9-11.members.linode.com ([67.18.176.11]:48306 "EHLO imap.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752594Ab3ENNSg (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 May 2013 09:18:36 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130514091407.GC2041@belle.intranet.vanheusden.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 11:14:08AM +0200, folkert wrote: > > Is it possible to "scrub" (check/verify) (the new-) checksums in ext4? When e2fsck does a full check, it verifies the contents of all of the metadata blocks, and this includes verifying all of the checksums. > Also: is it planned to add an option to add checksums to the data as > well? That's not currently on the development roadmap; I could imagine someone deciding to design an extension to ext4 that would do this probably by storing the checksums in the indirect blocks, but no one is currently working on it. Regards, - Ted